APBA ANNUAL MEETING – Chicago, Il.
OPC COMMISSION MEETING
JANUARY 26-27, 2012
- I. Roll Call and Swearing in of Commissioners
- A. Pledge of Allegiance
- II. Old Business
- A. 2011 Stats Review
- B. Hall of Champions
- 1. Inductee Approval
- C. Tech Committee Report
- III. New Business
A. Risk Management
- B. Safety Rules and Proposals
Proposal # 1
OPC Safety Rule 1, par. 1
Requested by David Hensel
Recommendation to amend or make addition to OPC SAFTY RULE #1
OPC Safety rule #1 reads as follows.
1.
A. Novice drivers must, for the entire one year period of probation, tape or paint a 2” wide orange stripe on the rear of the motor cowling on the boat in which they are competing. The stripe must extend from the top of the cowling to the bottom and must be visible to other drivers while the boat is on the racecourse. Novice drivers must be given an oral examination by the referee or race committee. Novice driver must show knowledge of course racing rules, to the satisfaction of the referee, before being allowed to enter a race. Novice drivers may not compete in the following classes: SST 120, SST 200, Formula 150, and F1 (Champ) &ModU.] The following procedure will be followed by all novice drivers for their first event in the class group in which they are competing: If the start is a pace boat, clock, or any other form of moving start other than LeMans, the novice driver shall drive in a position at the rear of the “pack”, while being observed by the referee and course officials. If the start is LeMans, the novice driver shall start at the position giving least advantage to the first turn regardless of any prior qualifying and must be delayed approximately two seconds at the start so as not to approach the first turn with the “pack.” During the course of the race the novice driver must always pass all boats on the outside and give adequate room to be overtaken on the inside by faster boats. If he is not cleared for “open competition” at the end of the race the referee shall not sign his temporary license and will be required to run additional races in the same manner until the referee clears him by signing his temporary license. This rule is not to restrict or disqualify any UIM or CBF member or any other duly qualified and licensed driver.
OPC novice drivers must contact the OPC Chairman for a NOVICE DRIVER FORM & must be filled out & signed by attending referee at each sanctioned event. After the driver has competed in 15 sanctioned events they may be granted permission by the OPC Chairman to compete in SST 120, SST 200, FORMULA 150,F1 (Champ) or MOD U.
Note: Webster Dictionary definition of Novice: A person who is new to the circumstances, work etc. in which he/she is placed.
B. Any driver wishing to compete in OPC classes SST 120, SST 200, Formula 150, F1 (champ) or MOD U, must have successfully competed in 15 OPC sanctioned events in a lower speed class of SST 45, SST 60 or Super Sport under rule 1.
Reason for amendment is as follows.
To add the #1 safety element to this high speed race craft that has been overlooked. (AN EXPERIENCED TUNNEL BOAT DRIVER)
- To not lose drivers of these classes through permanent injury or death.
- To promote safe racing.
- Lower insurance premiums.
- Lower the cost of racing through less carnage.
- Promote the lower classes of OPC.
- Novice driver will be more competitive & safer in lower speed class
- Adds safety to the spectators, drivers & rescue.
- Less race stoppage.
- Promotes membership.
In conclusion I feel this simple rule change is just & warranted. There have been too many accidents in the SST 120 class the last few years. I feel it is irresponsible for OPC to allow a novice driver with no prior experience of the handing issues of a 100 MPH plus tunnel boat turning at 3 to 4 g’s & allow them to learn on the job. This puts the fellow racers, spectator, officials, rescue personnel and novice driver all at risk. I do not believe any spectator in the crowd atKankakeein 2010 & 2011 after seeing all the accidents of the SST 120 class would say this is a sport I would like to get into.
Respectfully, David E. Hensel APBA Member 1206
NOVICE DRIVER FORM
NAME—————————– APBA #—————
ADDRESS————————————————————————–
CITY——————————- STATE——————————-
OPC CLASS————————————————————————
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
SANCTION #——————– REFEREE—————————-
OPC COMMISTIONER———————————-DATE—————-
Motion by _________________________________
2nd by _________________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _______
Proposal # 2
OPC Safety Rule 8, par. E
Requested by Jerry Book
Proposed rule change: Remove entire paragraph
Reason: Venting the front pickle forks on a tunnel boat or venting the nose of a vee botton boat is supposed cause what air that is trapped in the tips or nose to vent out and let water in. But, this is not what is happening water is coming in through these holes and causing an equalization of pressure in the hull and not letting the air out. Which causes the boat to remain floating upside down flat on the surface and not sinking.
I spoke with Bob Wartinger about this and he was in agreement that there is no longer a need for this rule since the boats have flotation around the safety cell.
Motion by _________________________________
2nd by __________________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _______
Proposal # 3
OPC Safety Rule 9, par. I – 10
Requested by Jeff Titus
OPC Safety Rule 9 Reinforced Cockpits
par I – 10 Current Rule: The top of the front of the capsule should be a maximum of 4” below eye level.
New Rule to read: The top of the front of the capsule should be a maximum
of 4” below eye level, if a structural canopy is not used.
Reason: If no structural canopy, the 4” below eye level is needed for facial protection.
If have a structural canopy, the wind screen can be much lower to provide better vision to
the water and horizon in front of the boat.
Motion by _________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _______
C. Series Requests
- 1. Major
- 2. Minor
C Championship Requests
1. Divisionals
- a. Northeast
- b. Southeast
- c. Central
- d. West Central
- e. Northwest
- f. Southwest
2. Nationals
- a.
- b. Future bids
- 3. North American Championships
- 4. UIM World Championships
D. General Racing Rules
Proposal # 4
Housekeeping change to GR 3 par 3.
Proposed by Jeff Titus
Current Rule: OPC GR Rule 3 # 3
3. Any driver who races a non-stock motor or hull or outfit which does not meet with technical specifications, as quoted in these rules, shall be disqualified. A disqualification for being underweight is not considered a technical disqualification for considerations for suspensions. Two (2) underweight disqualifications within six (6) months will result in a fine of up to $1000.00. A fine of up to $1000.00 for technical and/or underweight violations is to be determined by a committee of three persons appointed by the OPC Chairman. Such fines are payable to the OPC Budget. The driver is to be suspended from the time he is notified of the fine by the OPC Chairman until the fine is paid.
(Housekeeping) The bold printed sentence was left out of the rule book and has been placed back in the rule as stated below.
2012 OPC Rule Book: OPC GR Rule 3 # 3 to read as follows:
- Any driver who races a non-stock motor or hull or outfit which does not meet with technical specifications, as quoted in these rules, shall be disqualified. A third disqualification for use of non-stock equipment within a period of one (1) racing year will result in an automatic suspension for a period of one (1) year from the date the driver is notified by the OPC Chairman or until a fine of up to $1000.00 is paid. Two (2) underweight disqualifications within six (6) months will result in a fine of up to $1000.00. A disqualification for being underweight is not considered a technical disqualification for considerations for suspensions.
A fine of up to $1000.00 for technical and/or underweight violations is to be determined by a committee of three persons appointed by the OPC Chairman. Such fines are payable to the OPC Budget. The driver is to be suspended, if applicable, from the time he is notified of the fine by the OPC Chairman until the fine is paid.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 5
Rule 6 – Starting of a Race, Par 1
Proposed by Jose Mendana
Rule 6 – Starting of a Race
CURRENT – The Race Committee shall limit the number of boats starting the race to a number of boats which can safely run on the course at one time. In the event that more than the prescribed numbers are ready to run, the field shall be divided into qualification heats. There shall be considered as qualified for the final heat that number of boats in each qualification heat which is equal to the maximum allowable number divided by the number of qualification heats. If more than one boat has earned consideration for one vacancy………….
PROPOSED - The Race Committee shall limit the number of boats starting the race to a number of boats which can safely run on the course at one time. In the event that more than the prescribed number are ready to run, the field shall be divided into qualification heats. There shall be considered as qualified for the final heat that number of boats in each qualification heat which is equal to the maximum allowable number divided by the number of qualification heats. When qualification heats are broken down into more than one (1) Group, there shall be no less than six boats used in each Group. If two heats are to result in less than six boats in each Group, then all boats shall run together in one heat for qualifications If more than one boat has earned consideration for one vacancy………….
Reason: We should not be splitting fields that have 4, 5 boat heats. This bores the crowd and hurts our show to the fans. This also hurts competition and does not require a lot of driving on part of the drivers. There also is no reason to prolong the event and spend the extra time on the scorers to have to score extra heats when they could all be scored in one heat. Racing will be more exciting and fun if everyone is run in on group if only single digit boats show up.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 6
Rule 6 – Starting of a Race
Proposed by Jose Mendana
Rule 6 – Starting of a Race
B. Lemans Start – #11 Early Start Penalties
11) Current – Any boat starting early will be penalized. If the start is aborted, the penalty is 1 lap or move to the end of the dock, at the discretion of the Race Committee. If the flag drops to start the boats, there will be a 1-lap penalty.
PROPOSED – Any boat starting early will be penalized. If the start is aborted, the penalty is 1 lap or move to the end of the dock, at the discretion of the Race Committee. If the flag drops to start the boats, there will be a 1-lap penalty if the driver fails to fall back to the rear of the field. If the driver falls to the rear of the field, this will be deemed to be the penalty incurred and shall not be assessed a one lap penalty.
Reason: If a driver jumps the start and shuts the motor off and takes back off after the rest of the field has passed, he has already penalized himself by dropping to the back. If the driver starts early and does not drop to the back, then he should be penalized a lap
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 7
Rule 8 – Finish
Proposed by Jose Mendana
Rule 8 – Finish
6) Current In the event a race must be terminated for safety considerations, it may be called a legal race if more than one-half the time or distance has been achieved.
PROPOSED – In the event a race must be terminated for safety or time considerations, it may be called a legal race if more than one-half the time or distance has been achieved.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 8
Rule 11 – Scoring Points
Proposed by Jose Mendana
Rule 11 – Scoring Points
8) Current – All scoring penalties shall be assessed after the completion of the heat.
PROPOSED - All scoring penalties shall be assessed during and before completion of the heat.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 9
Rule 11 – Scoring Points
Proposed by Jose Mendana
Rule 11 – Scoring Points
7 – D. All OPC events other than Regional, North American, Divisional, World or National Championships, shall be scored for the purpose of high points competition as shown below under the column heading “Regular”. Regional, North American, Divisional, World and National
Championships shall be scored for high points as shown under the respective column headings. High points shall be based on overall
Reason: The current point structure for APBA puts too much weight on winning a heat and thus leads to one of our ongoing problems with Sandbagging. As an example, why should a first and eighth beat two third place finishes? We need our drivers to earn their starting positions by driving hard and having to pass other competitors instead of taking a heat off and just relying on a heat win. The current structure also suits more Inboard or hydroplane racing where 5 or 6 boats are only running. When OPC has its bigger fields, this Point system is not an accurate and fair point structure. I would like to see a point system that is a point for point system based on positions and # of boats. We should not award 400 APBA points to a driver who attends a local event that might have 4 boats and award 400 points to a driver who wins an event with 15 boats. This would make the US-1 high point much more meaningful as well. First place points should be reduced as the fields of boats are reduced. Some of the series such as PTT, PROP have good point structures that require good racing in their qualifiers and should be looked at for a new point’s structure that is much need in APBA for OPC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current APBA/OPC Points:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
Regional Championship
|
North American, Divisional, World Championship
|
National Championship
|
|
First
|
400
|
600
|
800
|
1200
|
|
Second
|
300
|
450
|
600
|
900
|
|
Third
|
225
|
338
|
450
|
675
|
|
Fourth
|
169
|
253
|
338
|
506
|
|
Fifth
|
127
|
190
|
253
|
380
|
|
Sixth
|
95
|
142
|
190
|
285
|
|
Seventh
|
71
|
107
|
142
|
214
|
|
Eighth
|
53
|
80
|
107
|
160
|
|
Ninth
|
40
|
60
|
80
|
120
|
|
Tenth
|
30
|
45
|
60
|
90
|
|
Eleventh
|
23
|
34
|
45
|
68
|
|
Twelfth
|
17
|
25
|
34
|
51
|
|
Thirteenth
|
13
|
19
|
26
|
38
|
|
Fourteenth
|
10
|
14
|
19
|
29
|
|
Fifteenth
|
7
|
11
|
14
|
21
|
|
Sixteenth
|
5
|
8
|
11
|
16
|
|
Seventeenth
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
12
|
|
Eighteenth
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
|
Nineteenth
|
2
|
3
|
5
|
7
|
|
Twentieth
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
5
|
| Minimum Number of Starters |
3
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED APBA/OPC Points:
|
Regular
|
Regional Championship
|
North American, Divisional, World Championship
|
National Championship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
25
|
37.5
|
50
|
75
|
|
Second
|
23
|
34.5
|
46
|
69
|
|
Third
|
22
|
33
|
44
|
66
|
|
Fourth
|
21
|
31.5
|
42
|
63
|
|
Fifth
|
20
|
30
|
40
|
60
|
|
Sixth
|
19
|
28.5
|
38
|
57
|
|
Seventh
|
18
|
27
|
36
|
54
|
|
Eighth
|
17
|
25.5
|
34
|
51
|
|
Ninth
|
16
|
24
|
32
|
48
|
|
Tenth
|
15
|
22.5
|
30
|
45
|
|
Eleventh
|
14
|
21
|
28
|
42
|
|
Twelfth
|
13
|
19.5
|
26
|
39
|
|
Thirteenth
|
12
|
18
|
24
|
36
|
|
Fourteenth
|
11
|
16.5
|
22
|
33
|
|
Fifteenth
|
10
|
15
|
20
|
30
|
|
Sixteenth
|
9
|
13.5
|
18
|
27
|
|
Seventeenth
|
8
|
12
|
16
|
24
|
|
Eighteenth
|
7
|
10.5
|
14
|
21
|
|
Nineteenth
|
6
|
9
|
12
|
18
|
|
Twentieth
|
5
|
7.5
|
10
|
15
|
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 10
Housekeeping Change to Rule 14, Championships par I – D.
Proposed by Jeff Titus
Current Rule: par 1 – D Any APBA class that is run in an annual national series of races( ie: APR, Champ Boat, etc. ) …………
Par 1-D Change: Remove (ie: APR, Champ Boat, etc) which state series’ names, etc .
Reason: Do not need these examples, as names change.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 11
Housekeeping change to Rule 14, Championships
Proposed by Jeff Titus
Rule 14 Championships, par 7.
Current Rule: In the event a World or National Championship becomes available ……
Change: Remove “World” from existing rule.
Reason: A UIM Worlds require a 2 year notification, so are unable to rebid in the same year
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 12
Housekeeping Change to Rule 15 Hall of Champions par 5.
Proposed by Jeff Titus
Current rule: Rule 15, Hall of Champions, par. 5 In order to determine final point totals in a fair manner for all classes, the following formula will be used. If point totals are awarded for competition in one class, the total number of points is multiplied by a maximum of 25 wet boats in that class for the given year. The total number of wet boats multiple cannot exceed 25.
Change to read: In order to determine final point totals in a fair manner for all classes, the following formula will be used. If point totals are awarded for competition in one class, the total number of points is multiplied by the number of wet boats in that class for the given year. The total number of wet boats multiple cannot exceed 25.
Reason: This states the number of the multiplier to be used per class up to the maximum of 25.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 13
Rule 16 Major and Minor Series
Requested by Jerry Book
Current rule reads:
Purse (Prize money plus tow money) $4000 major series $1000 minor series
Proposed change to read:
Purse (Prize money does NOT include tow or show money) $5000 per class / major series
$4000 per class / minor series
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 14
Rule 16 Major and Minor Series
Requested by Sam Winer
RULE 16-1 MAJOR AND MINOR SERIES
Current Rule: Major Series minimum purse = $4000
Rule to read as follows: Major Series minimum purse = $3000.
Reason: Since the SST-120 class no longer includes the SST-200, this will give a series the opportunity to conduct a Major Series for both SST-120 and SST-200 without the burden of substantially increasing the purse.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 15
Rule 16 Major and Minor Series
Requested by Sam Winer
RULE 16-1 MAJOR AND MINOR SERIES
Current Rule: Major Series average participants per class = 10
Rule to read as follows: Average participant per class per race = 8
Reason: With SST-120 not including the SST-200 in 2012, it will be more difficult to obtain 10 boats in either class. By reducing the minimum to 8, it makes it more possible to achieve the boat count for Major Series status in each class.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 16
Housekeeping change to Rule16 Series
Proposed by Jeff Titus
Current Rule: Rule 16, Par 1-F At any race at which the prize money is $5000 per class or more, the protest fee and the appeals fee may be equal to the prize money for first place, and must be noted in the advance program.
NOTE: Rule needs to be clarified as to fees stated for protests and appeals, or delete the rule in its entirety.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 17
Rule 16 – Major and Minor Series
Proposed by Jose Mendana
SERIES MINIMUMS Major Series Minor Series
Current : located in box under par. 1.
Number of races per season 5 ( Major) , 4 ( Minor )
Number of APBA regions raced in two
Purse (Prize money plus tow money) $4,000.00, $1,000.00
Average participants per class per race 10, 7
Proposed to ADD – Minimum Participants per race – 5 (Major) & 4 ( Minor )
Current and proposed addition ( D ):
A. Any series that falls below the average boat count for one year, will go on probation
B. A Major Series that falls below minimum boat count for two years will lose its major series status but may still be eligible for Minor Series status.
C. If a Minor Series falls below the minimum boat count for two years, it will lose its series status with the category.
D. PROPOSED – Any Series race that does not meet the minimum participants for an event shall not award series points to any of its participants for that event
E. Any series must comply with A, B, C and D above to be eligible for Hall of Champions awards in that year.
F. No more than two major series will be approved for any single APBA class. There shall be no limit on the number of minor series allowed.
G. At any race at which the prize money is $5,000.00 per class or more, the protest fee and the appeals fee may be equal to the prize money for first place, and must be noted in the advance program.
Reason: Series points should not be rewarded to races where there are not at least a handful of boats. It hurt the integrity of a season championship and this would help at least in maintaining decent fields at Series events
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 18
Rule 17, Protests and Appeals
Requested by Jim Bremer
Current Rule: Rule 17 Protests and Appeals, par 1.
- Driver Notification of Racing Infraction for required, signed by both the driver and the appropriate official.
DELETE RULE 17.1 AND REPLACE WITH:
All penalties must be assigned by the conclusion of inspection. It shall be the responsibility of the driver if he/she leaves the race site before the race completion (completion of race is 1 hour after the completion of inspection), to provide contact information for the referee to communicate with him/her. This information should be given to the Chief Referee and Chief Scorer.
REASON FOR CHANGE: Many times competitors, with long distances to travel leave the race site prior to race completion (1 hour after completion of inspection). The officials may be busy running additional heats and not be able to immediately communicate with the involved driver. This rule will prevent situations where the driver does not know of penalties until days later.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Proposal # 19
Rule 19 New Classes
Proposed by Jeff Titus
Current Rule: Rule 19, par. 3 … After one year, said Probationary National Class must have 15 registered drivers who have competed for the year. Class must also have had fields of six boats or more in two different Regions, in order to attain full National Class status the following year.
Question: Do you still want 15 registered drivers??????
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
Classes … OPC Rule 20
- 1. National Classes:
Stock Classes
- Sport C
- Sport CMarathon
- c. Super Sport / Pro Sport
- Formula V
- V Production
Super Stock Classes
- SST 45
- SST 60
Proposal # 20
OPC Rule 20, Classes par 3 Super Stock Classes
SST 60 Motor Standards (see also Rules 23, 25, 26)
Subpar 1
Proposed by Tammy Wolf-Jakob
CURRENT RULE:
OPC Rule 20, Classes par 3, Super Stock Classes, B, SST 60 Motor Standards ( see also Rules 23,25,26) Subpar 1
1) All cowling and engine graphics and colors shall be essentially the same as OEM, with updating to later models allowed only as a complete OEM design.
New Rule to read as follows:
1) It is recommended all cowling and engine graphics and colors shall be essentially the same as OEM.
RATIONAL:
We do NOT have OMC/Evinrude factory support. We should not be force to promote a manufacturer that is currently not promoting the sport. Engine cowling are a
prime sponsorship/promotional area. It should be up to the owners/teams/and drivers to place the logo of their prospective team, sponsor, motor builder, or manufacturer.
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
- SST 120
- SST 200
Altered Classes
- Mod U
- Champ Class
Formula Classes
- Formula 150
Sportsman Classes:
- Sportsman Class Mini GT
- Sportsman Class GT PRO
- Sportsman Class Formula Tri Hull
- Formula 1 Sport
Proposal # 21
Housekeeping change to Rule 20, par 2,
Divisional (Sportsman) Class.
Proposed by Jeff Titus
Currently stated in 2012 OPC Rule Book:
Rule 20, Classes, par. 2, Divisional ( Sportsman ) Classes:
Formula Tri Hull, Mini GT, GT Pro
Approved by the Commission in 2011, need to be added to the list of approved
Divisional ( Sportsman ) Classes
Rule to read:
Rule 20, Classes, par. 2, Divisional ( Sportsman ) Classes:
Formula Tri Hull, Mini GT, GT Pro, Formula 1 Sport
Note: will need to add Formula 1 Sport rules to the OPC Rule Book
Motion by _____________________________________
2nd by _____________________________________
Pass ____ Fail _____ To Ballot _____ Board ok/into effect 2012______ Into Effect 11/2012 _____
E. Technical Issues
F.New Class Proposals
- G. Motor Manufacturer Report
- H. Hall of Champions
- I. Category Awards
- J. OPC Website
Notes: